Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:41:28 -0400
From: Robert Ochshorn
Subject: Re: [snapshot] transpedia
Dear Dave,

These are typographically compelling, but don’t give me much confidence that they will “work” for the goals I have.

I’m preparing my talk for Michael Nielsen’s Tools for Thought event, and have settled on the topic of “Intimate Interfaces,” which I claim to be developing. I’ve come up with four qualities of such interfaces, and am very curious for your reactions:

This is all to say: I won’t believe any representational concept until I see it applied to a recording of a multi-person conversation in a noisy space.

I can send more notes from my talk if anyone is interested, but I have the feeling I’ve unleashed quite a few words on the group already today.

-RMO

On Mar 18, 2016, at 1:45 PM, Dave Cerf wrote:

On Mar 18, 2016, at 10:16 AM, Robert Ochshorn wrote:

a representation of audio that unlike spectograms, waveforms, pitch traces, or any other that I’ve seen, can compactly (inline with text) show speaker/accent/emphasis changes

<DSC09053.jpg>

<DSC09072.jpg>


<DSC09073.jpg>