First idea:
Making it easy to make a dial out of paper, for the Ometroplis simulation world.
Some of this was coming from this question of ... well, why is Ometropolis out in the world?
I was thinking a little bit about images of navigation instruments I saw flipping through _Cognition in the Wild_ and this idea from Alternate Reality Kit of being able to say, implement rules for physics or gravity for the whole world, or invert it ... or just having global rules. And that seemed interesting.
So the idea of this dial is two parameters can be set: time, and magnification. Time is simulation time, and then can be set to a factor from -10x to +10x -- thinking of Braid. Magnification will be shown a little more next example, but the idea is a kind of zoom factor for a specific part of a simulation.
We talked some about the drop-down menu of options: how to express numerical relationships.
I talked about being a little curious about natural language explanations ('scaled by', 'increased by,') and Glen suggested graphs as representations.
Bret pointed out that hiding options in a drop-down doesn't have to happen when not on a limited space screen, and one could have a 'menu' interface where one has the terms, as well descriptions of what they are, which I heard as moving towards learning what these relationships are in context -- having enough space to include a full description of say what 'scaled by' or creating a logarithmic scale means.
------
The other idea was a 'magnifying glass' with a laser pointer,
It could be used to mark off an area for magnification, and that would get projected onto a larger surface like a whiteboard.
I thought it would be nice to provide a menu for options for what to do with a laser pointer.
{points at, separates, encloses} is a gesture towards a kind of {point, curve, region} notion of things you might like to indicate in a plane.
Toby commented that it would be good to make clear the 'magnification zone' object, perhaps somehow labelled on the surface being projected onto, as opposed to it being hidden.
Glen commented that it would be nice to have say a string or physical curve representation to indicate the marked off area -- then you don't lose track of the contour, unlike with light.